That, and as I believe someone pointed out in one of the other threads on this topic, there are numerous examples of other cases/citations that are incorrect/missing from Justia. The fact is, there is a reason that Lexis and Westlaw can charge as much as they do for legal research tools - building and maintaining accurate databases of caselaw (particularly old caselaw, before our current era of consistent, standardized citations) is difficult and labor-intensive. It is not surprising that a free service such as Justia would be flawed.
I can't imagine it either. :)
Please click the pic.
Help keep the lights on
Become a monthly donor today!
....It is not surprising that a free service such as Justia would be flawed....
Yeah its not surprising when a crook tries to put something back when caught and tries to cover their tracks. Honest people usually own up to their mistakes. You have your opinion, I have mine. I have dealt with both crooks and honest people in my lifetime and when it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it’s probably a duck.
I wonder what their advertisers think? Do you see any apology for their actions or as you call it mistakes? Do you think a public statement is appropriate and overdue?
Quack Quack
http://onward.justia.com/2008/11/04/president-barack-obama/
They claim those were done to conceal the scrubbing of Minor.