Posted on 10/29/2011 11:38:28 AM PDT by bullypulpit
Cain needs to be properly vetted, otherwise it could be a massive embarrassment for the Republicans.
My point clearly was that something called “The Perry Report” shouldn’t be taking pot shots at Cain for such mistakes. The whopper I quoted is more egregious than the five Cain errors combined.
I understood. I’m in agreement with you, completely.
I was looping you in on my rebuttal to bullypulpit.
Got it, thanks.
Joe Hyde, writing in the Rick Perry Report...
How many Americans know what the “Right to Return” is? I’ll be honest, I never heard of it until a big deal was made about it with Herman Cain. This hardly makes him “unfit” to be President, especially given what we have now.
You are retarded!
Texas Gov. Rick Perry Signs Bill De-Funding Planned Parenthood
Tis true, it is in the Declaration of Independence............for those who understand that pursuit of happiness means "property" (a strong protection of property rights), then, of course, it is also in the U.S. Constitution...........
Amendment V, ...nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property...
Amendment XIV, Section 1, ...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property...
8:}
I believe what he said was that he would not appoint a Muslim to his cabinet or the judiciary under any circumstances, so no loyalty oath would be necessary.
Uh. Because he's from Texas?
Oh wait a minute, I'm not a Perry person. :-)
Ya right. Sure has been quite the master wordsmith so far in the debates. Not.
“1. Cain Ignorant on Arab “Right to Return” Propaganda That’s Really Meant to Destroy Israel
Cain is out for the destruction of Israel? Really dude? Cain was one of the few high profile people who went to Beck’s pro Israel rally unannounced and with out fanfare. He is a solid pro Israel guy by all accounts.”
Several of the candidates and other congress people said they would go with Beck to Israel.
Herman Cain was the ONLY one who actually went.
I’d rather vote for an honorable man who keeps his word, than for any of the professional politicians, who found some excuse not go.
Yeah, he was asked if he 'would feel comfortable' appointing a Muslim and his answer was "No, I will not." And then he goes on to say why he will not appoint Muslims. You can agree or disagree with his position, but having taken a stand at one point we again see where Cain tries to weasel out of his earlier comments. Very Romney-like of him.
Cain was absolutely right in those comments. Another check in the plus column for him.
In addition to "heartless"?
Great strategy you Perry people have - campaign by insult.
Good luck with that.
LOL That’s just not right. Get offa dat elephant!
And the first answer was the correct one, because it applies to HIM.
I wouldn’t hire or appoint a muslim to ANY postion either.
But I can’t, (I live in Australia) advertise (for example)
‘muslims need not apply’.
It’s a personal decision, unless THAT right has also been removed - has it?
>>>>> .. campaign by insult. Good luck with that.
You should know, you Cainiacs (aka. maniacs) have led the way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.