[justa-hairyape]

This event clearly demonstrates the media outlets that are being used to promote the AGW lie. And it also demonstrates that they report any pro-AGW news without questioning the validity of its source.

[aruanan]

‘I am baffled as to what he’s trying to do,’ Prof Curry said.

He's finding himself starved for relevance and attention since Climategate and is busily trying to become a media whore over by continuing to flog a scenario that for the past 13 years has been rapidly going down the toilet.

[Publius6961]

This topic is like being in a universe with not-so-bright chuldren.

Yes, there is global warming. Natural fluctuations.

It is NOT anthropogenic.

[ModelBreaker]

This is a really big deal. The AGW guys have grossly overreached and misrepresented their own data profoundly, in public, and in a way that can be disproved easily and with easy charts.

Take a look at http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/29/uh-oh-it-was-the-best-of-times-it-was-the-worst-of-times/#more-50286 which goes into this scandal in a lot of depth.

We need to be waving our arms and shouting about this because the old media will kill it and the Durbin conference is coming up.

This could be bigger than climategate.

[Chaguito]

"...have not risen for about 13 years. But in his view, this might not be ‘statistically significant’"

Whaaa? Statistically speaking this is a nonsense statement. He is stating the null hypothesis and saying it may not be significant. Statistical significance is to disprove the null hypothesis. Or am I missing something.