Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stuartcr
I understand that clearly, how do you think security should be increased that wouldn’t infringe on people’s freedoms?

If indeed the premise that 'security' should be 'increased' is valid, then it should fall to each person to increase their 'feeling' of security, e.g. "An armed society is a polite society."

The weak look for others to take care of them. The time is long past to start reclaiming responsibility for ourselves. Arming oneself and learning to use a weapon effectively is the only real security. It also doesn't infringe on other people's freedoms.

Anything else is nanny state Bovine excrement.

23 posted on 11/01/2011 8:47:16 AM PDT by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: JOAT

What about those that feel there is no need to increase their ‘feeling’ of security? Or those that ‘feel’ we need more? How do you balance the govts response to both of them?

What good does personal weapons do against explosive devices in a mall, or shipping containers at the docks?


27 posted on 11/01/2011 9:35:41 AM PDT by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson