Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: scottfactor

Yep, already tried and convicted. What’s the chance of finding an impartial jury? Oh, right. He was accused of child molestation, law and constitutional safeguards don’t apply. The American public is eager for anything to do with perverted sex and our news media is happy to furnish the details, it’s like legal pornography.


5 posted on 11/15/2011 4:07:10 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: R. Scott
Yep, already tried and convicted. What’s the chance of finding an impartial jury? Oh, right. He was accused of child molestation, law and constitutional safeguards don’t apply. The American public is eager for anything to do with perverted sex and our news media is happy to furnish the details, it’s like legal pornography.

Have you read through the Grand Jury report or considered the fact that Mike McQueary caught him in the act? There's enough reasonable evidence that proves he's guilty.
8 posted on 11/15/2011 4:36:00 AM PST by TSgt (whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive...it is the Right of the People to abolish it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: R. Scott

Grand Jury report here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/sports/documents/sandusky-grand-jury-report11052011.html

http://www.freep.com/assets/freep/pdf/C4181508116.PDF

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/11/06/sports/ncaafootball/20111106-pennstate-document.html

You’ll need a bucket next to you to throw up in while you are reading it.


9 posted on 11/15/2011 4:37:34 AM PST by TSgt (whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive...it is the Right of the People to abolish it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: R. Scott
Yep, already tried and convicted. What’s the chance of finding an impartial jury?

Despite the fact that Sandusky is more disgusting that a piece of rotting flesh, I know what you are saying. I too have been asking:

1. How is anyone going to convict Sandusky when his right to a fair trial is clearly being ignored? It's not a matter of protecting the slimeball from unjustified incarceration, it's a matter of building a case that the slimeball defense attorney can't slime his way out of.

2. Why do we keep feeding the pornographic details to the rest of the slimeball pervs out there? Even the most casual talking head discussion includes a description of the shower scene. I imagine the slobbering pervs are frantically TIVO-ing "Sandusky" so they can get yet another injection of pornographic detail. (I can't even count how many of my friends said "did you read the grand jury report?" NO, I DIDN'T. I don't have to. Everybody's narrating the shower scene with gut wrenching detail! Cue the slimey porno music!)

3. From the day this first leaked, I was saying: wait a minute, Sandusky was the slimeball who actually did this stuff! Why is everyone focusing on the enablers as if they are bigger slimeballs than Sandusky! Their time for judge and jury will come - and they will pay dearly for their weaknesses - but Sandusky is the slimeball here. If it's true what he did, he is a sick, sick man. So let's talk about creating an environment where sick slimeballs like Sandusky won't get a second chance instead of constantly beating the dead horse of Paterno's impotence.

Did I mention that Sandusky appears to be a big SLIMEBALL?

19 posted on 11/15/2011 5:49:01 AM PST by LoveUSA (God employs Man's strength; Satan exploits Man's weakness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: R. Scott
>it’s like legal pornography.

jack wagon are you implying that somebody is enjoying this gross spectacle like it is homo kiddie porn? Me thinks thou protest to much. It might be something you think about "pal".

24 posted on 11/15/2011 6:26:33 AM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: R. Scott
Already admitted that he didn't seek sexual favors from ALL the kids he ‘helped’, and that he regularly showered with young boys.

Seems that if we have already tried and convicted him in the court of public opinion, he has already pleaded guilty!

And I think Sandusky will probably walk on the charges - all too likely that a PedoState fan will be on the jury and have the reaction that most PedoState people have had over the last twelve years or more - i.e. no big deal, not as important as football.

50 posted on 11/15/2011 1:13:34 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson