Posted on 11/19/2011 5:15:22 AM PST by Docs Galore
Here you have the entire case of constitutional legitimacy laid out for all to see. - The Left claims it is not even a legitimate question.
Let's all be clear here. We have never been at the point of deciding the issue. - We have always and still are at the point of discussing whether or not this IS an issue. The Left has swept it under the rug quite well.
[snip]
The question is, "What is wrong .... exactly .... with asking this question?"
. . . . Check out # 139.
Thanks, Kenny Bunk.
Curiously, Huffpo has put up and mocked all previous Orly video appearances...but so far they are disinterested in this one. Could it be that it is too devastating to the Obama team?
yeah, that must be it
just what rerason are you hanging on to your white whale?
and by the way, I had totally forgotten about that comment from 2009, but, I didn’t ask Larry Bailey until last night
so, Ahab, since all you can do is prove I believed someone who lied to me...
When that old thread happened, I did a search on several sites and couldn't confirm Liddy’s birthday to more than one site that I remember.
But I do know Larry Bailey and asked him last night. he has the master list of all SEALS they use to bust posers and proved to me that El Sordo was right back then and I never followed through in asking Larry as I should have I suppose, but, if El Sordo was any more polite, I guess I would have back then. I only checked last night to shut him up but found out I was wrong!
I am just embarrassed that my funny story I have been telling for 30 years was based on someone pulling my leg and wasn't true at all!! LOL!
Oh, and since you were kind, I'll tell you the answer to his implied interrogation question:
The reason I removed names from the second version is that:
The whole reason I wrote all of this down was I was taking a literature class. I recounted to my instructor all the people I believed I had met in the Marine Corps. She told me I should write it all down for posterity and she would grade it.
So, that is why i wrote it out in the first place. Then, she told me that if I sweeten it up a little, she would PUBLISH it in a book of papers that has papers written by college students, but, to do so,I needed to remove all names so it could be called ‘fiction’ and the actual persons would not be named for legal purposes.
So, in the second release I did I had all the names removed. That is why the very first release it has Liddy’s name in it and the second one has a detailed description that history buffs would know was Liddy
and the new one, which I did release somewhere last night, has the Liddy encounter removed! It sort of takes away from the essay to mention, “Hey, here is my account of meeting a liar who made a fool out of me for 30 years!”
I don't know whether to buy that guy a chocolate milk or give him a black eye!
“and by the way, I had totally forgotten about that comment from 2009, but, I didn’t ask Larry Bailey until last night”
You forgot something like that but you´ve got 20/20 memory for a chance encounter over 30 years ago.
That´s convincing! /s
How much are you paid for trolling, jake?
Do you recall any prior Freeper handles you have used?
Just a question. Is the poster, Pharnsworth, whom you also addressed, known to you as a person or poster under that name or any other name prior to this thread?
“I have never bought the born in Kenya theory.”
**********************************************************
Agree with this statement. The “out of Kenya” story seems to be an adopted story by the Obama’s - prior to 2004. After it became clear 2008 was the goal There was no more Kenyan-born stories. And just because Obama adapted the story to fit (one of) his names and then has tried to hide it does not validate the Kenya story. In fact, Kenya may be a honey pot trap to detract from other possibilities such as Canada, Indonesia or a different birth mother in Hawaii.
How soon we forget Nixon, who was also elected. As was his VP Who also was removed.
They’ve gotten their marching orders from CPUSA leaders...you know, get in your neighbors faces.
Que?
He could to have done it without the cooperation of the Republican Leadership.
There is no other explanation for the Sense of the Senate Resolution that declared McCain was eligible to be president.Obama was originally included in this resolution but was removed, why?
Republicans I assume. They rarely fight back being in the Stupid party.
I wish I could find more and better examples of Obama's claim to Kenyan fame, but at the time no one thought there would be any reason to keep such stories. Nowadays, you see information regarding Obama actively being scrubbed from the net. Check this out.
http://radaris.com/p/Eleanor/Berkebile/
Six months ago, there were dozens of hits on the name "Eleanor Berkebile" (Stanly Ann's Aunt who lived in Blaine Washington.) Now, even the women who are NOT Stanly Ann's relative have been removed. There are NO hits on that name at all!
It's sort of like the Justia scandal except smaller.
Nice words but sadly, demonstrably false. The law does not apply to our political class, unless someones behavior is so scandalous as to draw attention to their fellow crook buddies, then someone has to fall on their sword.
Unlike Taitz who actually attempts to do something, all you do is shoot off your mouth.
DEFINITELY a retread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.