If they are successful, one of those candidates will be selected. The winner this time was Barrack Hussein Obama - but it could have been any of a hundred others with exactly the same result.
It is a mistake to think that removal of one bad President in an election will prevent his backers from electing another one just as bad in a subsequent election. The backers always have multiple candidates and do not care which one finally wins as long he is one of theirs.
We are dealing with a system for putting bad people in office and letting them stay in too much power for too long.
I’m not arguing that the system isn’t broken.
My argument is that it took a unique individual with Obama’s blank slate to do this the first time.
Of course they’re going to try again. The question is what is done in the meantime to stop them.
Obviously there MUST be a reason why powerful people who are in the know haven’t spoken up to challenge this. There are NO strong voices for a reason. That’s because of the wall that was constructed around Obama, one that is difficult to tear down. It isn’t just his election that is the problem, it is also that no one can touch him without triggering what some would call a “Constitutional crisis” (even though we’re living in one every day), let alone a world of hurt brought down on the ones we need to speak up to challenge this huge fortress that is protecting him.
How much further could Tatiz and others get with a wall of Congressman and Senators behind them? A slate of judicial rulings? A truthful press? Money funneled to the lawsuits? A team of lawyers and investigators helping with their every need? People lined up waiting to pitch in and trying to help in any way possible?
Obviously many feel that the challenge is too big, today. Otherwise, he would have been removed from office already. Those in authority think this is too hot to handle for a reason.
I think others look at the construct of this and think it’s too big to touch. And they’re right.