Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity
But so far your position has consistently been rejected(emphasis supplied)

Really?

Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)

60 posted on 11/25/2011 1:14:52 PM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford
"Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)"

That has nothing to do with prostitution. My use of the phrase "in this regard" meant I was dealing with the prostitution issue. Clearly, no law, whatever the motivation in passing it - religious or secular, can violate the bill of rights.

69 posted on 11/26/2011 3:17:13 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson