Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Offers Lessons for Michigan Alcohol Law Reform
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 11/28/2011 | Michelle Minton

Posted on 11/28/2011 7:54:19 AM PST by MichCapCon

Imagine walking into your local wine, liquor or beer shop and finding all of your favorite brands on sale — permanently. This could be the reality for Washington liquor consumers as the state transitions from a government-run distribution system to a private one as a result of the state’s successful privatization initiative, which voters approved this month.

The new system permits liquor producers to sell directly to retailers; something that is generally prohibited under the three-tier distribution system which separates producers from retailers by forcing them to sell their product to a wholesaler who then sells to stores. Freeing the liquor market in this way allows producers to increase their profits and retailers to charge less. This increase in efficiency will result in more profitable businesses, lower consumer prices, reduced state spending and increased tax revenue.

Pennsylvania, Oregon and Virginia are considered likely to follow Washington’s lead. Michigan, however, with its long suffering economy, dwindling population, competition with neighboring states and the appointment of business-friendly regulators, is uniquely positioned to become the next state to truly transition from a control state to a free market for alcohol.

Michigan is one of the remaining 17 control states, where the government buys all hard liquor legally consumed in the state and then resells it to wholesalers. In Washington state, for example, before this month’s vote, the state had a monopoly on all liquor sales, both wholesale and retail. In some states, including Iowa, Montana, Wyoming and Mississippi, the government licenses private stores to retail hard liquor, but controls wholesaling.

For decades after Prohibition, Michigan controlled all levels of liquor sales — including both retail and wholesaling operations. Before the 1990s, supporters of alcohol privatization in Michigan had little success. In 1991, Gov. John Engler put the state on track to privatization. Gov. Engler was adamant about getting the state out of the liquor business. In 1997, the state sold off its liquor stores and ended government warehousing and shipping of liquor. It did not end the government monopoly on wholesaling hard liquor as well as continuing price controls. As a result of these remaining government controls, Michigan residents may pay an average of 3percent more for liquor than noncontrol states nationwide. Anecdotally, they pay far more than that compared with consumers in Indiana.

And in Michigan, it’s not just interference in the hard liquor market that drives up costs for consumers and businesses. The mandatory three-tier system and franchise laws give wholesalers in the state immense power over brewers. The three-tier system requires that producers sell to wholesalers and retailers purchase from wholesalers, making the wholesalers a state-mandated middleman. Franchise laws force brewers to enter into exclusive contracts with wholesalers. The contracts can sometimes span decades, and brewers may not extricate themselves from those contracts without risking significant costs. These rules may violate federal antitrust laws and eliminate competition among wholesalers, offering them little incentive to improve performance or lower prices. They also result in lost revenue for brewers and reduced availability and higher prices for Michigan craft beer lovers.

With this month’s vote, Washington becomes the first state to do away with the mandatory three-tier system for liquor. Michigan has a unique opportunity for reform. Gov. Rick Snyder appears to favor getting the government out of the alcohol market. He has appointed a knowledgeable business leader to the chair to the Michigan Liquor Control Commission — Andrew J. Deloney. Deloney is the former head of the Michigan Restaurant Association and is familiar with the cost alcohol regulations impose on Michigan businesses. Deloney says he hopes to create a system with “as little government restriction and regulation as possible.”

In addition, Gov. Snyder has commissioned a 21-member Liquor Control Advisory Rules Committee to review Michigan's liquor control system and offer recommendations for making it “simple, fair, transparent and efficient, and conducive to business growth and job creation.” If Michigan really wants to reduce consumer prices and aid businesses in the alcohol industry, it should not only follow Washington’s lead, but go further.

Michigan should allow private wholesalers to take over the state-run liquor operation and insist on competition for voluntary contracts with brewers, distillers and wineries. Those suppliers should also have the option to sell directly to retailers. The state should also end price-setting, franchise laws, and the post-and-hold laws that force wholesalers to announce changes in the prices they charge retailers, thus giving their competition time to adjust their prices as well. These protectionist laws undermine competition and keep prices high for businesses and consumers. Michigan has an opportunity to lead the nation in alcohol distribution reform.

TOPICS: Food; Government
KEYWORDS: alcohol; regulation

1 posted on 11/28/2011 7:54:36 AM PST by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Depending on in which state you live, whenever you buy a bottle of liquor, anywheres from 40-60% of the price you pay is for TAXES...

2 posted on 11/28/2011 8:08:56 AM PST by ken5050 (Support Admin Mods: Doing the tough, hard, dirty jobs that Americans won't do...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Texas still has a monopoly on wholesalers, even though they are “private”. At least Michigan has moved in the right direction, away from Government wholesalers.

3 posted on 11/28/2011 8:11:50 AM PST by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

This can’t come to PA fast enough. The state store system is a total rip off. The mindless, incompetent stiffs that work at them are union so it is going to be a tough fight.

4 posted on 11/28/2011 8:17:48 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan
Yes.. this is one area where Texas is very “blue law” about.

It annoys me no end. The blue laws need to go. It goes against the Libertarian streak that Texas was founded upon.

Before anyone accuses me of being anti Christian, please keep in mind that the Texas Republic from 1836 through its initial US statehood and through the Civil war and through prohibition was very libertarian.

It is only post WWII that a lot of these ultra conservative blue laws came through.

It annoys me no end that you have to go to a ghetto store on Loop 12 in a bad area of Dallas to buy liquor, when citizens in other states can go to Costco and buy premium single malts at discounted prices

Also, why oh why does the state care if a car dealership wants to remain open all 7 days? What business is it of the state?

Christians need to understand that being pro-God does not mean imposing lifestyle laws on others. Not everyone observes the Sabbath. Already most shops are open on Sunday. It does us no good to ban car dealerships from selling 7 days a week.

Same thing with alcohol. We can already buy beer and wine and all retail stores like Costco and Walmart. Why make this artificial distinction on “spirits”

5 posted on 11/28/2011 9:02:00 AM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
BTW, in case anyone wonders why I bring up Church in my previous posting, it is because on similar threads before, people have said that “God wants us to observe Sabbath, God banned liquor. I am glad Texas follows God”

My point here is that there are many of us Church goers that think of ourselves as very devout. However, we do not agree with the blue laws. Does not make us any less believing of God....

Just saying.. that some of us scripturally do not think alcohol drinking is prohibited... and some of us scripturally believe that the New Testament releases us from Sabbath requirements...

Others may disagree and I FULLY respect that. However, I would like y'all to respect our point of view too.

6 posted on 11/28/2011 9:06:48 AM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

“This could be the reality for Washington liquor consumers as the state transitions from a government-run distribution system to a private one as a RESULT OF THE STATE’S SUCCESSFUL privatization initiative, which voters approved this month.”

RESULT OF THE STATE’S (of Washington) HAD NOTHING to do with it, Washington State citizen’s have the Right to enact law(s) via Initiative Process, and it was through this process (Initiative Process) that the State of Washington is being forced out of the liquor business, just 1 (one) year prior the same type of Initiative failed just barely, and the state democRATS took no action to safely divest the state of it’s liquor business, the old Ostrich head in the sand trick.

What can the citizens of the State of Washington say other than; hey our democRAT(s) Governor(s) made sure that the state get’s NO MONEY from the Indian Gaming Business, and now democRAT(s) Governor(s) are making sure that the state get’s NO MONEY from the liquor business.

Welcome to The People’s Republic of Washington (State).

7 posted on 11/28/2011 9:58:52 AM PST by Stanwood_Dave ("Testilying." Cop's don't lie, they just Testily{ing} as taught in their respected Police Academy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson