[texanred]

Of course you’re going to side with the employer “on this one.” You are an apologist for the homosexual agenda.

If I'm an apologist for anything its for a business owner to be able to set the policies for his own business and expect employees that work there to follow them. I expect the same in my business and want no less for others.

Macy’s policy of “non-discrimination” does not explicitly include allowing men to use the ladies’ restroom or dressing room.

Actually, its in bold and italics in the original article: "Macy’s policy which allows men to use the women’s dressing room ..."

[WXRGina]

It is wearisome dealing with you reality-phobe, homo-apologists. We’ve already shot down all the various homocentric “arguments” on the original site where this—my—column is published. You would last longer there, because Jim Robinson does not put up with homo-trolls very long here on Free Republic.

You’re welcome to come read and partake in the discussion at the home site for my radio blogs, where you won’t get zotted nearly as quickly: http://www.dakotavoice.com/2011/12/macy%e2%80%99s-shows-religious-freedom-and-homosexual-agenda-cannot-coexist/