Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stormhill; LucyT; WhizCodger
“It’s very exciting to have the prospect of shining (at long last) some sunlight on Obama, but come February Joe better produce some logical justification for not having released the information in December.”

I have been wondering what type of evidence would require a legitimate delay until February.

Because Arpaio is a straight shooter and not a game player, in my assessment, WITNESS TESTIMONY comes to mind as a possibility, especially testimony from a foreign witness (Kenyan?) who might not be expected to be in a secure location (coming from Kenya to Arizona and the watchful eye of Sheriff Arpaio?) until early February.

A hint that the evidence that Arpaio disclosed to Dummett concerned positive proof of a foreign birth (likely Kenya) comes in this quote from the article: "So they’re most certainly not going to recuse themselves over the impeachment of Obama. So if he gets off scot-free, then everything he’s done is set in stone; we’ve set precedent, and that means that anybody who was born outside of this country can come over here and be president."

Dummett said this RIGHT AFTER seeing or hearing about Arpaio's "devastating" evidence. Note that Kenyan birth documents can ONLY be authenticated by Kenyan authorites who could easily be corrupted by the $ millions available to the Obama cabal...but an incorruptible Kenyan witness with character (what a concept!) if they could make it to a safe location in the US long enough to give a deposition on video and perhaps bring along contemporaneous documentary or photographic evidence, would indeed be devastating. Totally speculative, of course, but I can hope!

70 posted on 12/11/2011 10:01:52 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

Sometimes the most obvious clue is in front of us, and we overlook it because of disinformation.

SAD disappeared from sight in Hawaii around April 1961. She reappeared in Washington State during August 1991 accompanied by baby Barry, a witness claims.

We know from University of Washington transcripts she took correspondence courses for two years.

Why, if she was supposedly living in Seattle, WA, would she take correspondence courses? She wouldn’t.

A red herring was thrown out early to throw everyone off the track. It is easy to pay people to lie.

BHO2 wasn’t born in Hawaii nor did he live there until he and his mother popped up there in 1963.

This is why SAD’s passport records prior to 1965 are missing.

This is why BHO2’s incomplete original Hawaiian birth certificate, filled out by his grandmother Maddy Dunham, is labeled “filed” rather than “accepted and filed”.

This is why BHO2 sent a million dollars to Odinga, not to run for political office, but to intimidate and terrorize Christian missionaries in Kenya who knew the truth about Obama.

Note: when the White House presented Obama’s “birth certificate” they included the exact time of BHO2’s birth as exists on his BC from Kenya.

This was done to be cheeky or it was done because it is true.


89 posted on 12/11/2011 4:16:23 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
Canadian birth is my guess. His Aunt lived 5 minutes from the border in Washington. Maybe the hospital at White Rock Canada has a patient list with A. Dunham on it.

I think you are right. They are taking time, and this means they have evidence and they are now verifying all the associated details, and following new leads. Nails for the coffin. They don't want to get caught with a fraudulent document, so they need to verify all people involved do indeed exist. Forensic analysis also takes time. Ink and paper tests. Signatures. Building a case. This is what prosecutors and detectives do.

I think Arpio said it will be shocking and controversial. This guy says devastating. This is looking like good news for America and the cause for freedom. It is amazing that this is happening without any MSM attention focused on it.

93 posted on 12/11/2011 6:02:31 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

Seizethecarp: “I have been wondering what type of evidence would require a legitimate delay until February.”

I notice that the Arizona primary is scheduled for Feb. 28 so perhaps the sheriff is merely treating this as his deadline to have results. I would guess he’s attempting to amass as much information and justification possible to be sure the accusations stick. And there are always chances that more investigation will provide even greater findings than those that are “devastating”? Even though time is an enemy, poor investigating techniques and compromised evidence is even more so...


98 posted on 12/11/2011 7:56:33 PM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp; stormhill; LucyT; WhizCodger

Witnesses that should be deposed.

Brian Schatz - Current Lt. Gov. of Hawaii. HDP leader in 2008. Question to Mr. Schatz - “Why was document that did not have all the legal requirements of certifying a candidate eligible submitted to CEO in 2008? Why was language included in 2004 that met state law requirements ommitted in 2008? Is it because you did not want to be charged with aiding in fraud?”

Janice Okubo - Too many questions to list in one posting.

Joe Miller - formlerly with Factcheck. Question to Mr. Miller - “Was your job at CBO provided in exchange for supplying the ‘Born in the USA’ Factcheck posting?”

Jess Henig - formerly with Factcheck. Question to Ms. Henig - “When (specific date) did you actually take picture of the short form COLB? Whose camera was used? Why was the date and time not checked before taking the pictures? Did someone provide you with the digital photo files and ask you to write a story around them?”

William H Gilardy, Jr. - Attorney for Stanley Ann Dunham in her divorce from Obama Sr and HDP attorney. Question - “What is the truth. You had direct access to records that are in question as part of the divorce settlement.” Follow-up: “Did you advise Brian Schatz to not sign a document attesting to the Constitutionally eligiblity of Obama?”


100 posted on 12/11/2011 8:32:14 PM PST by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson