Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Under Fire for Praising Accused Traitor
canadafreepress.com ^ | 12/26/2011 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 12/26/2011 2:06:21 PM PST by TBBT

Fox News is the latest news organization to pick up on the revelation, first reported by AIM, that Ron Paul had praised WikiLeaks source Bradley Manning as a hero and patriot. Directly referring to WikiLeaks and Army soldier Bradley Manning being held in detention, Paul said, “Should he be locked up in prison or should we see him as a political hero? Maybe he is a true patriot—who reveals what’s going on in government.” The comment drew strong applause from Paul supporters.

Video of the event, officially posted by Ron Paul’s Campaign for Liberty organization, also shows the Republican presidential candidate, now rising or perhaps leading in the polls in Iowa, attacking the CIA and its treatment of terrorists.

Paul “let his mask of semi-respectability fall when he praised Bradley Manning, accused traitor,” wrote Washington Post “Right Turn” blogger Jennifer Rubin.

A conservative view of Manning, who had been an Army intelligence analyst in Iraq, was expressed in strong language by columnist Deroy Murdock. He said Manning “should be court-martialed for espionage and treason.” He added, “If convicted, he should be placed against a wall and executed by firing squad” He said the same goes for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, if he is extradited to stand trial here.

Manning, a homosexual Army soldier with “gender identity” problems, has just undergone a preliminary hearing which could lead to a court-martial, where evidence was produced showing his collaboration with Assange and WikiLeaks. The charges against Manning include aiding the enemy in violation of Article 104 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. However, the prosecution team has announced that it is not seeking the death penalty.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: apaulling; bradleymanning; paul; paultardation; soldier; treason; usarmy; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Under fire? Really? Seems to me that Paul has pretty much got a pass on this so far.

Can you imagine the difference in coverage if these things had been said by a leading "legitimate" candidate?...

1 posted on 12/26/2011 2:06:24 PM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBBT

You are very busy today.

Is the pay scale by post? Reply?

Perhaps by the number of times Ron Paul is called “crazy”?

Nice gig.


2 posted on 12/26/2011 2:09:07 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Ronulan much?


3 posted on 12/26/2011 2:11:16 PM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Ron Paul is a useful idiot for the Left, in more ways than one. At the moment, nobody on either side seriously expects him to win the nomination, but as long as the MSM can talk about racism and treason in the same breath as “GOP contender Ron Paul,” the narrative of “those extremist Republicans” can continue unabated.


4 posted on 12/26/2011 2:11:32 PM PST by sthguard (The DNC theme song: "All You Need is Guv")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Gingrich actually.

You’re for Romney, I presume?


5 posted on 12/26/2011 2:12:05 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I’ve had the exact same thoughts today. Great minds and all that!


6 posted on 12/26/2011 2:13:32 PM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: algernonpj

Awesome.

Seems to this poster someone very recently concluded that it was an emergency to knock Paul out as quickly as possible.

Is he poised to win in Iowa perhaps?

Something is clearly going on with all this mudslinging. The talking points are even all the same.


7 posted on 12/26/2011 2:16:56 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Gingrich actually. You’re for Romney, I presume?
You first claim to be taking an interest in my posting habits. Then you ask this?
8 posted on 12/26/2011 2:20:12 PM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
Well they claim to be for Gingrich but are defending uncle Wacko so I would keep my expectations for reason and such rather low...
9 posted on 12/26/2011 2:26:51 PM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Sorry to disappoint you. The world does not revolve around you.

I have no idea who you support. If you wish to share it with readers go ahead.

Tell us why he or she is a good leader.

All I’ve seen is a bunch of carping - not just you, it’s pretty much all anyone does anymore. It seems to be all that’s done in this primary.

Nobody is simply supporting who they believe is best, being honest about it, and trying to explain why that person is best.

Guess I’m old fashioned that way.

Now campaigning means destroying the other guy.


10 posted on 12/26/2011 2:32:21 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

You have established one thing.

Ron Paul doesn’t have many supporters at FR.


11 posted on 12/26/2011 2:34:09 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

And yet another reason to NOT vote Paul. The man becomes more deranged by the minute.


12 posted on 12/26/2011 2:35:00 PM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Ironically you might be wrong, Paul might have more people paying attention to him after all the mud that’s been flying around.

Where there’s mud, there’s Karl Rove.


13 posted on 12/26/2011 2:35:39 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: svcw

The word you’re supposed to be using today is “kook”.

Please try to keep current. :D


14 posted on 12/26/2011 2:36:59 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Paul needs to get out of the Republican Party and join the green party.


15 posted on 12/26/2011 2:37:51 PM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Paid anti-Paul agents notwithstanding, do you agree or disagree with Paul’s statement about Bradley Manning?


16 posted on 12/26/2011 2:39:22 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
I missed the memo. Paul has flown by kook to deranged.
17 posted on 12/26/2011 2:40:34 PM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
The word you’re supposed to be using today is “kook”.

ROFL. Thanks for the update. I thought it was still fruit loop. ;)
18 posted on 12/26/2011 2:41:24 PM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Dunno, what was Paul’s statement, and what was the context?

If you don’t mind? And what was the situation about Manning, I haven’t been following it closely. Is he that guy who leaked secret documents to be released publicly? (I really haven’t been following that story closely, could be way off base)

Thanks.


19 posted on 12/26/2011 2:41:52 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

...I stopped arguing on these posts weeks ago. I only drop by to see the daily SOS and have a laugh. Good post.


20 posted on 12/26/2011 2:43:11 PM PST by gargoyle (...a well informed public and a well regulated militia...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson