Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: John D

From the Des Moines Register posted about 6 hours ago:

“Paul responded by saying he supported the move to pursue the Sept. 11 terrorists.

He also clarified his stance on 9/11, saying the U.S. policies — not its people — were to blame for the attacks.

“They didn’t come here because you’re free and prosperous —they don’t go to Sweden and Switzerland,” Paul said. “…The 9/11 Commission said that the motivation was the fact that we were over there and we had been over there for a long time.””

He is not blaming America for the 9/11 attacks, he is rightly pointing out that because we choose to be involved in the ME and base our military over there we became a target for terrorism. It’s not a hard concept to understand, stick your nose in a hornets nest and you’ll get stung sooner or later. He has also said that he supported going after the terror groups that did this, just not the “nation building” that has caused us to be in Afghanistan for the past 10 years now.


196 posted on 12/29/2011 6:15:11 PM PST by trapped_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: trapped_in_LA
“They didn’t come here because you’re free and prosperous —they don’t go to Sweden and Switzerland,” Paul said. “…The 9/11 Commission said that the motivation was the fact that we were over there and we had been over there for a long time.”

Why did the Taliban destroy the Buddhas of Bamiyan? Because we were over there?

Or maybe it was because they're psychotic Muslims who want to destroy everything that's not psychotic Muslim.

Including us.

211 posted on 12/30/2011 5:54:03 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson