Well jeepers, what on earth could you expect otherwise? There would be no science at all were there not human minds to "mediate it."
To me, disparagement of the "anthropic principle" is totally jejune.... Not to mention pointless: The only world human beings know is the one reflected through human minds.
How's that for "stirring the pot?" LOLOL!!!
Thanks so much for writing, dear grey_whiskers!
Talk about your Occam's razor violations! (needlessly multiplying *universes* not just entities); and it prompts the counterquestion of how they have any proof of the various underlying theories which are supposed to make multiverses possible : hint -- the word so-beloved of those who hate God and are willing to do ANYTHING to deny knowledge of him is called "fal-si-fi-a-bil-ity".
I have yet to see any of them suggest a feasible experiment which would be able to unambiguously falsify these cosmologies.
oist, meet petard, or something.
(The usual response is a blistering, frothing-at-the-mouth ad hominem.)
Cheers!
bttt
Gagdad Bob (Robert Godwin) said...
Darwinians can’t help anthropomorphizing the theory, being that the dullest of them are still anthropomorphs.
8/18/2010
Gagdad Bob said...
“........For the materialist to place an arbitrary limit with regard to what the human being may know and experience is purely arbitrary and incoherent, for what is the principle that says we may only know this truth but not that truth, or this reality but not that?”
8/18/2010
In the comment section here:
Creation Myths of the Tenured http://onecosmos.blogspot.com/2010/08/creation-myths-of-tenured.html