Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Generation Porno [Edit]
National Catholic Register ^ | 1/2/2012 | Patrick Archbold

Posted on 01/02/2012 11:16:06 AM PST by marcbold

In defense of taboo.

Liberal intelligentsia circa 1990: “You know, you fundamentalist types are all hung up on sex. If you would just lose your hangups, things would be better. Take pornography for instance, it is the taboo associated with it that makes it “forbidden” and therefore tantalizing. If we could just get rid of the taboo, most people would lose interest in it.”

Well, they got their wish. For the last fifteen years, almost every last bit of the taboo against pornography has been eradicated from our culture. Pornography is everywhere.

Once upon a time, pornography was a rare thing. When I grew up, my only exposure to pornography was from that sweaty kid down the street. He had a mustache at 14 and he kept a few Playboy magazines under his mattress until his mother found them. Then we didn’t see him again for a month.

Now pornography is everywhere. It invades your home like termites and you need to be ever vigilant to keep it out. It is on demand on your television and it is never more than a click away on your computer. Porn has gone mainstream.

Porn references are more common on television than God references. Porn actresses now regularly make the crossover into “regular” television and movies, but which themselves are increasingly pornographic. Even so-called “conservative” news outlets do not miss a day without a celebrity bikini slide show and/or a discussion of some celeb breast enlargement, did she or didn’t she?

So the liberal intelligentsia got their wish and have been proved right and all us fundamentalists have been shown the door? Pornography is much less popular for want of taboo, no?

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/pat-archbold/generation-porno/#ixzz1iKTbwWTU

(Excerpt) Read more at ncregister.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Religion
KEYWORDS: culture; pornography

1 posted on 01/02/2012 11:16:18 AM PST by marcbold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marcbold

Porn can absolute shred marriages. It changes male brain chemistry. Tragic.


2 posted on 01/02/2012 11:22:54 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcbold

Time for some popcorn.


3 posted on 01/02/2012 11:28:31 AM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcbold
It's all a question of what your brain does with the images. If you look at a bunch of young nekkid chicks and have clean thoughts, the image is harmless. Note: the image is relevant but safe for work.
4 posted on 01/02/2012 11:29:45 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Yep. When I was in college, many years ago, I figured out that if you let porn images into your head, it’s very difficult to get them out again. They are damaging and addictive and demeaning to both parties.

So, I made it a point not to let them in.

That’s pretty difficult for young people these days.

How’d that porn work out? Divorce rate way up. Abortions on demand. Broken families are now the norm in many places. Child abuse commoner than it used to be. And these people are certainly not happier than they used to be, although they may believe the contrary.


5 posted on 01/02/2012 11:32:42 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marcbold

Porn is really “in” with the young college girls. I’ve been shocked at how many “nice’ girls from good religious homes go on FACEBOOK and feature their boobs on the profile page. I’ve caught a few young nieces at it. It’s as if they’re auditioning for Hugh Hefner.

They may live to regret it when they’re out of college and sending resumes for job interviews. FACEBOOK is one of the first places personnel managers go to check on applicants.

Some career counselors are telling these young women to clean up their internet images before they send out the resumes.


6 posted on 01/02/2012 11:34:42 AM PST by Palladin (No Newts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
How’d that porn work out? Divorce rate way up. Abortions on demand. Broken families are now the norm in many places. Child abuse commoner than it used to be. And these people are certainly not happier than they used to be, although they may believe the contrary.

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. Read some history on family patterns on our fair planet as they've existed for thousands of years in this and other chapters available HERE.
7 posted on 01/02/2012 11:39:05 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marcbold

It’s not about a hangup or a taboo. It is about responsibility. It is the belief that it is irresponsible of them to engage in sex, for whatever reason, if they are unwilling or unable to raise together the children that may be conceived. The harm done to the children (either aborted, or raised by single parents) rivals that done by drunk drivers.


8 posted on 01/02/2012 11:41:06 AM PST by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcbold
Several years ago there was an individual on our community's library board who, when confronted about pornography on the library computers, said, "Who says pornography isn't educational?"

Conservatives have dropped the ball by allowing liberals to monopolize community boards.

Filling board positions with conservatives should be top priority for the Tea Party.

9 posted on 01/02/2012 11:52:14 AM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Judging by what he has written about Reagan and Carter that Lloyd Demause seems like a nut.


10 posted on 01/02/2012 12:21:07 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marcbold

I haven’t read the whole article yet, but have to note that CS Lewis, the great Protestant apologist whose writings and wisdom are deeply respected by Protestants and Catholics alike, wrote precisely the same thing in the 1940s! He didn’t use the word “porn,” but was writing about the liberal insistence on getting sex right out there for everyone to see and talk about.

He carried the comparison forward into a useful discussion of other sins of indulgence too. Brilliant, brilliant Christian.


11 posted on 01/02/2012 12:44:07 PM PST by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Demause is a rather fringe character. He sees everything in history as tied to child sexual abuse, even though he also presents data showing that overall, child abuse is declining not increasing.

The whole problem with porn is that it is a form of fetishism that is strongly reinforced by the rush of endogenous opioids in the brain. It functions at the expense of authentic attachments, eventually leading to isolation, with jaded and degraded relationships.

12 posted on 01/02/2012 12:51:15 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marcbold

bttt


13 posted on 01/02/2012 12:59:13 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("Do you mean now?" ---Yogi Berra, when asked "What time is it?" ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. Read some history on family patterns on our fair planet as they've existed for thousands of years in this and other chapters available HERE.

Just wow - great link. Thank you!

14 posted on 01/02/2012 1:14:29 PM PST by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Ah, the Noble Savage!

And then we elected one.

Funny thing - Savagery doesn’t look so acceptable now, does it?


15 posted on 01/02/2012 1:23:40 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; Talisker
Judging by what he has written about Reagan and Carter that Lloyd Demause seems like a nut.

Yeah, I think so and also from the way he tries to shoehorn Christianity and Judaism into the mold--it's just plain overreaching; however, I gave the link because of the heavily referenced data he makes available, not his political point of view, in order to disabuse people of the notion that the olden days were so good and pure. That view is as far out of touch with reality (aside from perhaps some aspects of the last 100 years in the West) as the greenie belief that everything before technology (or before man) was a blissful Eden in which man lived in harmony with a balanced and good nature until man developed technology and caused everything to become unbalanced and turn to crap.
16 posted on 01/02/2012 6:17:08 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson