Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Clara Lou

Keep telling yourself that.

We saw what happened in 2006 and 2008 when W. was the candidate of the Iraq War. Obama won in 2008 because he promised to bring the troops home.

If you make the 2012 election about starting a war with Iran instead of defeating Obama, Obama will regain his support among Independent and Millennial voters.

The so-called “Paultards” are at the center of the electorate on starting a war with Iran. The warmongers are on the fringe on that issue.


110 posted on 01/04/2012 1:28:09 PM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: WilliamHouston
We saw what happened in 2006 and 2008 when W. was the candidate of the Iraq War. Obama won in 2008 because he promised to bring the troops home.

Excuse you, I know that this is the only available anti-war forum talking points you have for reference, but the Democrat wins in 06 and 08 HAD NOTHING to do with the Code Pinko Agenda of "Bring the troops home" (I know you Paultards repeat this stuff over and over to try and convince yourselves) - it had everything to do with Conservatives being pissed off and discontent with the party for compromising with the Democrats on FISCAL matters.

By and large many Conservatives sat those elections out, and those who reluctantly supported the RINO candidate in 08, did so for Palin and it was too late to salvage the Establishment Candidate against the Chicago machine who did as you are requesting of us now: to keep on the kid gloves and say nothing bad about those whom are NOT Conservatives.

We tried it your way already, by being nice to those who are our ideological enemies. It does't work. It never works. We fight for what we believe, or die trying. Playing along to get along ensures more of the same. It's Primary season, why should we give a rat's arse about offending Paultards and Mittens supporters when (as you have demonstrated yourself) have no problem bashing Evangelicals and Conservatives?

If you make the 2012 election about starting a war with Iran instead of defeating Obama, Obama will regain his support among Independent and Millennial voters.

I can appreciate the fact you Ron Paul worshippers willfully ignore the FACT that Iran's regime has BEEN AT WAR WITH US SINCE 1979. It's however, beyond reprehensible for you people to tar anyone noting the danger a nuclear-armed Iran is, as 'warmongering' or 'starting a war' with Iran. War is upon us, whether you want it or not. If want to keep appeasing Jihadists - then do so while risking your own neck and not risking genocide for the rest of us.

The so-called “Paultards” are at the center of the electorate on starting a war with Iran. The warmongers are on the fringe on that issue.

It's beyond ludicrous to assert that the mainstream of America wants to appease and surrender to avowed enemies by turning tail and running away home so the Iranian regime can finish making nukes so they can usher in their 12th Imam and instigate world conquest.

Look, I know the Paultards are committed Pacifists and Isolationists - but I refuse to get along with idiots willing for us to commit nation suicide, thinking themselves more moral, while clueless about this hostile world we live in.

It's just another example of why Paulistinians and RINO's do not belong in a Conservative party.

118 posted on 01/04/2012 2:02:13 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamHouston

Ron Paul is no better presidential material than Obama. He won’t be the nominee anyway. Deal with it.


121 posted on 01/04/2012 3:30:21 PM PST by Clara Lou (nObama, noRomney, noPaul, noBachmann, noSantorum . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson