Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Got Food Stamps and So Can You!
The College Conservative ^ | January 16, 2012 | Sydney Phillips

Posted on 01/16/2012 7:02:07 AM PST by Sopater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Sopater

“...Is it really this simple to obtain welfare benefits here in the United States?...”

Yes, it is.

“That being said, the students I know who use food stamps are hard-working, productive individuals whose parents won’t compensate them for the costs of college....”

“Parents won’t compensate”? Wow. And, this from a college conservative.


21 posted on 01/16/2012 7:37:44 AM PST by SuzyQue (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Yes, and retired people living on Social Security are not eligible (at least in DE). But then again, isn’t it government’s goal to kill off all the old people by the time they’re 70 years old? No benefits, but plenty of stealing money from workers’ wallets. Plus a steady base of political support for RATs.

Just wait until DeathCare kicks in; they’ll have 2 for 1 sales at funeral homes. Soylent Green factories shoot up.


22 posted on 01/16/2012 7:38:53 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
I regularly shop in a grocery store where liquor is sold and on numerous occasions have watched people pay for their groceries with an EBT card and then make a cash purchase of beer and liquor. EBT cards are not restricted on food items and I often see EBT purchases are mainly for junk food and soda rather than healthy food. If Michelle Obama wanted to have some real impact on obesity and nutrition for children she should be fighting to prevent EBT cards from being used to purchase junk food.
23 posted on 01/16/2012 7:40:43 AM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

The fact that the author got what he got with NO IDENTIFICATION was very telling as well. The legal requirement that only US Citizens (or even legal residents) can get this aid is being blatently ignored. Every person who gets this aid is a vote for the Welfare State—something the bureaucrats and politicians understand very well. They have no problem building an army of parasites as long as they pull the right lever (legally or not) on Election day.


24 posted on 01/16/2012 7:42:51 AM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sopater; Bill W was a conservative; verga; thesaleboat; Sick of Lefties; Chainmail; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


25 posted on 01/16/2012 7:45:40 AM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Most welfare benefits are handled by each state. Which means there are at least 50 different data processing systems doling out the goodies. The last time I checked the federal governemnt does not do a very simple thing. Something that could be done for a few thousand dollars. Here it is:

1) Dump every SS# for every recipient in every state in to a data file.
2) Take the data files and find SS# duplicates.
3) Suspend benefits on all duplicate SS#’s until the recipient comes to the state in person and verifies their personal information.

The best thing they could do would be to simply connect all the various computers that run in every state and red flag SS# duplicates.

The states could do some other very simple things. For example, they could take the SS# and run it against credit data. If there is a loan on a vehicle or other things where the person has the income for paying for such stuff kick them off the dole.

The amount of fraud and theft is staggering. The states know it and the federal government knows it. But the people involved don’t care about that. It is not their money. In fact, they don’t even see it as money. Their mindset is so bizarre you would think they live on another planet. Believe me, I have been in countless DHS offices* and know this for a fact. There are hardly any controls in place to watch the money. And if you suggest ways to implement controls they fall on deaf ears. Why? Because a lot of people have government jobs who give out all this free stuff.

* Usually I was the minority in the building.


26 posted on 01/16/2012 8:02:43 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

I’ve always said that I would teach my children the value of a dollar and the value of an education by letting them earn money for college and then paying for it.

My oldest son worked for 2 years after highschool as a laborer in a factory and saved all his money and now he’s in college studying engineering. My second son is currently working in the same factory saving money to go to college in a year or so himself... Such good boys. :-)


27 posted on 01/16/2012 8:07:26 AM PST by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Shame is virtually non-existent today. In fact, shame has been replaced with arrogant defiance. I see it in the demeanor of each EBT leech I get behind at WalMart EVERY time I go buy something. The only cash they have to pony up for their visit is for cigarettes, wine or beer. They are disgusting. This will all come crashing down one day soon.

Yep. What we should do here is get rid of these 'debit' cards and go back to the old school stamps. As I recall, one of the reasons given for the switch was to save these 'poor' souls the embarrassment of using them.
28 posted on 01/16/2012 8:54:31 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
earn money for college

For most people going to college means they have made the decision they want a traditional job working for someone else. They might as well get used to the idea of working. A college degree for someone allergic to work is a pointless waste of time and resources.

29 posted on 01/16/2012 8:54:46 AM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

They don’t even care about the stigma any more. So many of them use them that it is now a status symbol among the slothful.


30 posted on 01/16/2012 9:05:02 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

And, such a great parent!


31 posted on 01/16/2012 9:05:42 AM PST by SuzyQue (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

With UPC codes it would be very simple to set up the EBT cards to authorize ONLY “appropriate” food/goods for the users....rice, beans, fresh fruit, vegetables, chicken, tuna, diapers...etc.


32 posted on 01/16/2012 9:05:42 AM PST by goodnesswins (2012..."We mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
1) Dump every SS# for every recipient in every state in to a data file.
2) Take the data files and find SS# duplicates.
3) Suspend benefits on all duplicate SS#’s until the recipient comes to the state in person and verifies their personal information.


The best thing they could do would be to simply connect all the various computers that run in every state and red flag SS# duplicates.

The states could do some other very simple things. For example, they could take the SS# and run it against credit data. If there is a loan on a vehicle or other things where the person has the income for paying for such stuff kick them off the dole.


Also, start mandating drug testing for welfare recipients as well. Between these two ideas, we could probably cut welfare benefits in HALF.
33 posted on 01/16/2012 9:06:59 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

34 posted on 01/16/2012 9:09:19 AM PST by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
For most people going to college means they have made the decision they want a traditional job working for someone else.

Most who don't go to college have a traditional labor job working for someone else, and earning less money. Most of the people that I know who went to college did so so that they could earn more money using their brains than they could as a laborer using their muscles.
35 posted on 01/16/2012 9:11:56 AM PST by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar
1) Dump every SS# for every recipient in every state in to a data file.
2) Take the data files and find SS# duplicates.
3) Suspend benefits on all duplicate SS#’s until the recipient comes to the state in person and verifies their personal information.

The best thing they could do would be to simply connect all the various computers that run in every state and red flag SS# duplicates.

The states could do some other very simple things. For example, they could take the SS# and run it against credit data. If there is a loan on a vehicle or other things where the person has the income for paying for such stuff kick them off the dole.

Also, start mandating drug testing for welfare recipients as well. Between these two ideas, we could probably cut welfare benefits in HALF.

If you wanted to cut them by 90% add the requirement of "volunteering" for working on public works improvements a certain number of hours per week - as little as 5 hours a week would probably be enough to make the majority quit.

36 posted on 01/16/2012 9:23:22 AM PST by Sparticus (Tar and feathers for the next dumbass Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The Safety Net has become a Hammock.

In other news, Water is Wet.


37 posted on 01/16/2012 9:23:30 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (Liberals, Useful Idiots Voting for Useless Idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar
I will actually one-up you on that. Don't go back to the old-style stamps; go farther back than that.

Give out "commodities."

Dried beans and peas, rice, canned tuna, peanut butter, flour, corn meal, powdered milk, raisins, cheese, maybe some other canned foods. I suppose these were purchased from farmers or food processors by the government and given out monthly. This was subsistence food. You might not eat royally, but you would eat well enough to keep body and soul together. That is what was done back in the 1960's.

I remember it well because I had relatives on "welfare" who got these government commodities. Some of the items they "wouldn't eat." These items were given to my mother by the relative and we ate them. (Our menu choices at home were "take it or leave it.")

If anyone is truly in need of the food and assistance, they will take the commodities. If they refuse this type of assistance, then they aren't in that much need. It's pretty hard to trade your dried beans or rice for drugs, too.

I suspect that going back to the commodities would decrease the amount of $$ spent on "food assistance" dramatically.

38 posted on 01/16/2012 9:26:40 AM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Yep, I’ve mentioned on related threads before that the food stamp program should only be good for basic staples.

Of course, I’d feel kinda bad taking away Swordfish and caviar from the little people. Wait, no I wouldn’t.


39 posted on 01/16/2012 9:26:40 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
Some states do allow retired people on Social Security to get Food Stamps, if they qualify on the basis of income, etc. I've seldom run into many who get any substantial amount, however. I'm not sure that I've talked to anyone who gets as much as $200 a month here in Texas.

People with children in their households, such as grandparents taking care of grandchildren, usually qualify for more than older adults living alone or older couples.

40 posted on 01/16/2012 9:31:13 AM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson