Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WPaCon
Is the idea of the Second Amendment really to let the citizens have the same weapons as the military?

The idea was that an armed citizenry would be far stronger than any army the Government could pay for.

I suspect that it would take quite a while for the idea of nuclear weapons to take hold. It is rather hard to determine how they would handle it. They might well want the State governments to have and control them.

40 posted on 01/16/2012 12:52:35 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
I suspect that it would take quite a while for the idea of nuclear weapons to take hold. It is rather hard to determine how they would handle it. They might well want the State governments to have and control them.

I'm fairly comfortable with the current state of affairs, if you can afford one you can have one. It's just that they aren't really very useful if your aren't a nation state (read gang of armed thugs convinced of your moral superiority).

41 posted on 01/16/2012 1:00:00 PM PST by Mycroft Holmes (Returned for regrooving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Guns obviously have self-defense purposes and a citizenry armed with guns can keep government in check.

I don’t see how a tactical nuke could possibly provide for self-defense. If anything, I’d see a nutcase obtaining one and killing thousands. If a nutcase gets a gun, you can shoot him. But if he detonates a nuke, its too late for anything to be done about it. A warship is similar to a nuke in those respects. That’s why I’m surprised to hear about how it was legal for private citizens to own them.


42 posted on 01/16/2012 1:01:30 PM PST by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson