They’re going to have to work fast to do that ... and a new forgery better be bullet-proof. Any discrepancy between a new one and what he already released is going to sink his ship faster than the Costa Concordia.
Is Obama or some OBot ready to cross the Rubicon?
Is some Obama-Bot(s) ready to proffer a forgery in court?
Is someone dumb enough to take that chance for Obama?
I bet Obama thinks someone will always cover his behind as usual.
Jerry Corsi’s source said they had a forgery in their office before Obama released this PDF. In fact, IIRC, the forgery was placed in their files right around the same time that some of us were talking about Abercrombie talking up Obama’s BC to prepare for the unveiling of a forgery. But then he had to back down and actually ended up spilling the beans that they don’t have a BC for Obama - I believe because HDOH Director Neal Palafox wouldn’t go along with the plan and because there was talk right here about making state eligibility bills that would require the vital records to be audited - with computer transaction logs, etc. And the Cold Case Posse is talking about microfilms, according to WND.
Shoot. I need to go. There are some discrepancies they’ll have problems with. But some of the discrepancies they will claim are artifacts from the so-called “scan” of the document. I think they are figuring it would be better to present a document from Obama himself rather than risk the HDOH actually having to obey an eventual subpoena for the records to audit what they’ve done with his vital records. They may think they can have a convincing enough fake that the judge won’t ask for an audit.
Or they could already have it arranged that the judge won’t ask for an audit.
I’m still saying what I was saying at this time a year ago: the only way we’re gonna know anything is by auditing the computer transaction logs, and I would also add the original paper documents and the microfilms.
This judge REALLY, really needs to realize how crooked the HDOH is and that just because they certify something does NOT mean it is genuine. They have falsified records on Obama’s behalf at least once and they will easily do it again.
Aagh. I’m gonna be late.
There is always a flaw. Like walking across a field after a new blanket of snow, every crime leaves footprints. And often it is some small detail the criminal never even thought of. The fake CBS/TANG memos were exposed because the perpetrator didn’t realize that the typeface used (with the ‘th’ superscript) was rarely used in the early ‘70’s, and then only by specially trained typists. It was a huge red flag. A forger here, would have to worry about paper, ink, embossed seals, aging factors, bleed rates of ink, and probably a dozen other variables that are hard to control. A tall order. Plus people talk.