“This is old news isn’t it?”
Precisely, and I have a hunch the current interview didn’t provide a nickels worth of new material, therefore the seemingly confusing decision by ABC suits to hold off until Monday after the votes are counted airing of the interview, if at all. They know the timing would be good cause for a lawsuit, and the damage they could do wouldn’t be enough to gain the financial support they would need from Leftist interests that would normally support their actions.
This article is a teaser to intimate that Newt is one bad fellow. The interview couldn’t do it, so they are using the idea that it could to attempt to cause voters to think about not voting for him. Who would benefit?
FYI ~~The information I’d not seen was her 1995
threat to end any Newt presidential run. Anyway,
not everyone is online and sees every news article
here as it’s posted.. especially so when thread
posters neglect the important addition of adding
the proper keywords so threads are searchable later
by subject/keywords.
Wonder how much she is getting paid and by whom.
Is that a Ferrari I see in her future?
Just another political hack.