[moehoward]

"Why can’t a commentator, who isn’t a reporter, give an opinion that isn’t happiness and joy?'

That's a good point. Krauthammer said "It's analysis, not advocacy". Yeah that's a little bite of a weasel out, but it's true.

While Krauthammer IMHO appears to be even keeled in his "analysis". Hume does not. His verbiage and commentary structure indicates a clear bias AGAINST Newt.

[redinIllinois]

“That’s a good point. Krauthammer said “It’s analysis, not advocacy”. Yeah that’s a little bite of a weasel out, but it’s true.

While Krauthammer IMHO appears to be even keeled in his “analysis”. Hume does not. His verbiage and commentary structure indicates a clear bias AGAINST Newt. “

But don’t forget that Kraut is a psychologist who used to work for the dems.

I don’t trust him at all.

He actively participated in the take-down of Herman Cain, who was our best chance for the most freedom this go-round.

But God is in control, so I guess it wasn’t to be, this time.

My position from here on out, is whoever the media hates / fears most, is who gets my support.

Newt.

Who can best articulate for the nomination, and in the general, that liberty is what makes America great?

Newt.

[greeneyes]

Read on another thread last Night that Brit has a personal issue against Newt, and probably should be recusing himself from analysis.

I lost a lot of respect for him lately, and he used to be one of my favorites.