Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apuzzo Weighs in on Obama Subpoena and Consequences
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/22/is-obama-guilty-of-identity-fraud-rather-than-ineligibility/ ^ | Jan. 22, 2012 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 01/23/2012 5:45:40 AM PST by jdirt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Beckwith
The court reports to the Georgia Secretary of State, a conservative Republican, and the Secretary of State simply removes Obama’s name from the STATE ballot.

That's where I get worried.

I think Obama's fallback position is to ignore the judge, whatever he rules, and then use the full force of the Presidency (and all his Chicago sub-specialties) to put pressure on the Georgia Sec State and Governor to be included on the ballot anyhow.

So far, Obama's ability to delay, deflect, sidetrack and quash any legal challenge before it gets to the discovery stage has been positively Houdini-like. So much so that I am pretty certain that, out of sight, there are some hard-faced men and women who get up close and personal with judges to make sure they make "wise" decisions.

So... even if the court recommends exclusion from the ballot, it doesn't necessarily follow that it will happen. I hope it does, but I won't bet money on it.

21 posted on 01/23/2012 3:10:12 PM PST by Ronin (Now 15 kilograms down since August last year. Hell yeah I'm bragging!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

You’re talking about a default? You could have that on the merits or the preliminary/discovery issues or both. Here, it looks like BHO could file a Motion for Reconsideration, seeking the admission of the latest “long form” certificate. This is speculation on my part.


22 posted on 01/24/2012 7:35:29 AM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Gotcha, affirmative obligation to produce evidence in support of eligibility. I would assume BHO would attempt to satisfy is burden of production here with the latest long form, via a motion for reconsideration?

The dilemma for BHO is that the submitted document would then be open to scrutiny.


23 posted on 01/24/2012 7:40:01 AM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

We’re talking two separate issues: enforcement of an administrative subpoena v. eligibility. Regarding the latter, I would absolutely agree that the State of Georgia has that right. Regarding the former, I have a lengthy, tortuous history of personally seeing subpoenas ignored for want of enforcement.


24 posted on 01/24/2012 7:48:45 AM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: STJPII

So, Team Obama ignores the subpoena, and Georgia removes Obama from the ballot.

Game — set — match!


25 posted on 01/25/2012 4:13:16 AM PST by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson