To: Oldpuppymax
Obama to Judge:
(Bleep) you. I'm going to Vegas
3 posted on
01/23/2012 9:06:11 AM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Would that count as “contempt of court”, with all the associated legal trauma?
6 posted on
01/23/2012 9:11:06 AM PST by
Old Sarge
(RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
To: Responsibility2nd
This is going to real unpopular, but ...
I don't think the President should have to personally appear to answer a subpeona. That opens the door for every crackpot liberal judge to issue subpeonas when there is a republican in the White House.
"Just send your lawyers along with the requested documents ... that will be fine. Otherwise, you will not be on the ballot."
14 posted on
01/23/2012 9:19:20 AM PST by
In Maryland
("Truth? We don't need no stinkin' truth!" - Official Motto of the Main Stream Media)
To: Responsibility2nd
Obama to Judge: (Bleep) you. I'm going to Vegas Bad idea. Judges tend to dislike allowing a precedent like that. The judge is likely to thus rule in favor of the plaintiffs and declare that Obama's name be stricken from the Nov ballot. That will liven things up.
It would be real juicy if the appeal went to the Supremes, and they off-handedly asked Obama to produce TO THEM, the documents in question.
33 posted on
01/23/2012 10:11:25 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson