Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Stimulus Bombshell ^ | 1/24/12 | Craig Eyermann

Posted on 01/31/2012 3:49:49 PM PST by GSWarrior


That’s really the only word we can use to describe the release of a “sensitive and confidential” 57 page memo, written by then soon-to-be U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers in December 2008, about what became President Obama’s signature economic program in the first year of his presidency: the “stimulus package”.

James Pethokoukis has summarized some of the most significant aspects of the memo, which we’ve excerpted below, and which reveals the Obama administration’s thinking behind what became an over 821 billion dollar boondoggle. The bold text represents Pethokoukis’ summary of that thinking, which is directly followed by a supporting quotation from Larry Summers’ memo:

1. The stimulus was about implementing the Obama agenda.
The short-run economic imperative was to identify as many campaign promises or high priority items that would spend out quickly and be inherently temporary.... The stimulus package is a key tool for advancing clean energy goals and fulfilling a number of campaign commitments.

2. Team Obama knows these deficits are dangerous (although it has offered no long-term plan to deal with them).
Closing the gap between what the campaign proposed and the estimates of the campaign offsets would require scaling back proposals by about $100 billion annually or adding new offsets totaling the same. Even this, however, would leave an average deficit over the next decade that would be worse than any post-World War II decade. This would be entirely unsustainable and could cause serious economic problems in the both the short run and the long run.

3. Obamanomics was pricier than advertised.
Your campaign proposals add about $100 billion per year to the deficit largely because rescoring indicates that some of your revenue raisers do not raise as much as the campaign assumed and some of your proposals cost more than the campaign assumed.... Treasury estimates that repealing the tax cuts above $250,000 would raise about $40 billion less than the campaign assumed.... The health plan is about $10 billion more costly than the campaign estimated and the health savings are about $25 billion lower than the campaign estimated.

4. Even Washington can only spend so much money so fast.
Constructing a package of this size, or even in the $500 billion range, is a major challenge. While the most effective stimulus is government investment, it is difficult to identify feasible spending projects on the scale that is needed to stabilize the macroeconomy. Moreover, there is a tension between the need to spend the money quickly and the desire to spend the money wisely. To get the package to the requisite size, and also to address other problems, we recommend combining it with substantial state fiscal relief and tax cuts for individuals and businesses.

5. Liberals can complain about the stimulus having too many tax cuts, but even Team Obama thought more spending was unrealistic.
As noted above, it is not possible to spend out much more than $225 billion in the next two years with high-priority investments and protections for the most vulnerable. This total, however, falls well short of what economists believe is needed for the economy, both in total and especially in 2009. As a result, to achieve our macroeconomic objectives—minimally the 2.5 million job goal—will require other sources of stimulus including state fiscal relief, tax cuts for individuals, or tax cuts for businesses.

7. Team Obama thought a stimulus plan of more than $1 trillion would spook financial markets and send interest rates climbing.
To accomplish a more significant reduction in the output gap would require stimulus of well over $1 trillion based on purely mechanical assumptions—which would likely not accomplish the goal because of the impact it would have on markets.

11. The financial crisis wasn’t just Wall Street’s fault.
A significant cause of the current crisis lies in the failure of regulators to exercise vigorously the authority they already have.

On December 31, 2008, the total public debt outstanding for the United States was $10,699,804,964,612.13. President Obama’s economic stimulus package of approximately $821,000,000,000 represents 7.7% of that figure, all of which was added to the national debt and went to no good end.

Over three years later, there is little-to-no indication that the Obama administration has learned what it already knew would be true from the very beginning: their idea of an economic stimulus package was an extraordinarily bad idea that would be a monumental waste of taxpayer dollars.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: deficits; obama; stimulus

1 posted on 01/31/2012 3:49:53 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

....especially since the original “crisis” in September 2008 was manufactured.

2 posted on 01/31/2012 3:53:54 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Yes, but it was useful in spooking McCain to endorse Obama. As Romney will this coming October.

3 posted on 01/31/2012 4:00:17 PM PST by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
Hah! And when will this analysis hit the State Run Media? The Democratics and the White House spin-meisters will bury this as mere political puffery or deign either not report it or give it fifteen seconds of soon-to-be-forgotten airtime. And the Pubbies will not use it in defense or offense for the presidential campaign.

How disappointing. Boondoggle failure, misuse of taxes and credit, and epic disaster in social engineering gets no notice.

4 posted on 01/31/2012 4:01:16 PM PST by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

This president makes Jimmy Carter look like abe lincoln. A dried turd in a tuxedo could beat obama in November, if he runs.

5 posted on 01/31/2012 4:10:47 PM PST by spawn44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spawn44

“This president makes Jimmy Carter look like abe lincoln. A dried turd in a tuxedo could beat obama in November, if he runs.”

I hope so, because it’s seeming more likely everyday that’s what will be on the GOP ticket.

6 posted on 01/31/2012 4:19:41 PM PST by Carolina_Thor (It's always better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson