did she actually state “ I offer these witness as experts in the field of X”? Unless the attorney actually asks for them to be recognized as experts and (after any objections) they judge rules they are experts then they are not experts and can not have their testimony be expert witness testimony.
And a reasonable judge, interested in getting at the truth, would have said to Orly, ARE YOU OFFERING THESE WITNESSES AS EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF X?
And allowed her to say YES, I AM YOUR HONOUR.
And then let the witness continue with a description of their expertise.It was evident from their testimony they had the required amount of experience and background to give the evidence they gave.
Now tell me this, while you Orly-bash to your heart’s content, where are the fancy lawyers who would have done a better job of it?
Are you a lawyer?