How can Judge Malihi both dismiss the Plaintiff’s exhibits for their failure to follow standard rules of evidence, and rely on that same material to assert that Obama was born in Hawaii? The “birth certificate” introduced was stated to be a copy of a false document, purportedly pulled off the internet, as evidence of forgery. It lacked any semblance of an official seal or chain of custody that would allow the court to rely upon it as a credible birth document. Malihi’s opinion depends on his assumption that Obama was born in the US. Where was valid evidence of this presented to his court? (Though two Plaintiff’s foolishly stipulated to this “fact” sans evidence in an attempt to be clever, the attorney in the third case did not, which means it would have to be proved in court). But as many suspected all along, you can’t beat a rigged game.
Taking this country back is going to be hard work indeed.
“...dismiss the Plaintiff’s exhibits for their failure to follow standard rules of evidence...”
I’m just blowing smoke out of my ears!!!!
THEY “fail” to follow standard rules, and yet Bath-House Barry and his no-show “attorney” spit in Malihi’s face and there are NO CONSEQUENCES!!!