Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58
However, Congressional Legislation has frequently changed the requirements necessary, to obtain birthright citizenship. Legislation trumps Common Law. Legislation trumps Natural Law. Legislation trumps the Law of Nations. Legislation trumps Vattel.

Oh, so that's why Wong Kim Ark lost his case and was denied citizenship by the Supreme Court! Because there were Congressional statutes at the time—and even a treaty with China‐that prohibited the children of Chinese nationals from becoming US citizens!

You're so brilliant, Kansas58. You have opened my eyes so that I can finally understand why the Supreme Court decided than Wong Kim Ark was not a citizen, in spite of what the 14th Amendment says. The silly Amendment was overruled by Congressional statute. How obvious it should have been.

11 posted on 02/05/2012 9:53:39 AM PST by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery
Wrong again!

Wong Kim Ark won, he did not lose his case!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark

BTW, a Treaty on Citizenship, with another Country, would be the Law of the Land. The Constitution can be altered by Treaty, in many cases.

(Obama knows this, and this is why Obama and Holder wanted a Treaty with Mexico, to restrict gun rights!)

21 posted on 02/05/2012 10:13:38 AM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson