The fact that one of the attorneys entered a copy of Obama’s BC into evidence doesn’t mean a thing!! It could have been a crayon drawn BC for all the weight of factual evidence it carried as to Obama having been born in Hawaii!!!! It was NOT an original BC. And as long as originals are said to exist, only they can be presented as proof that Obama was born in Hawaii. At least one of the plaintiff attorneys subpoenaed the original BC and Malihi ruled the subpoena must be honored. Had it been and an original brought to the court as evidence, Malihi could have used it for his factual claim that Obama was born in Hawaii.
HERE? Your own legal genius submitted the “evidence” so you have no real reason to object.
The Judge was free to accept what was admitted by the petitioner, period, without protest from opposition counsel for Obama, who was not there anyway.
It would have been OBAMA’s job to protest any evidence presented by opposition counsel.