Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Harlan1196; edge919; All
I think if you check the judge’s ruling you will see he was just talking about Orly’s evidence and witnesses.
Why "think" when you can KNOW!

@Farrar/Welden/Swensson/Powell v Obama - Judge Malihi Final Decision - Georgia Ballot Challenge - 2/3/2012

This Decision has been consolidated to include the four challenges to President Obama's candidacy filed by Plaintiffs David Farrar, et al., David P. Welden, Carl Swensson, and Kevin Richard Powell. Section I of this Decision applies only to the case presented by Ms. Taitz on behalf of Mr. Farrar and his co-plaintiffs,Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren, and Laurie Roth, and does not pertain, in any way, to the cases of Mr. Welden, Mr. Swensson, and Mr. Powell. Section II applies to all Plaintiffs.

And as far as Section II is concerned...what does "considered" mean?

118 posted on 02/18/2012 12:14:49 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: Harlan1196; All
...the following facts are considered...
119 posted on 02/18/2012 12:16:48 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36

And section I applies to which case?


120 posted on 02/18/2012 12:17:47 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson