Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Harlan1196
“This Court finds the decision and analysis of Arkeny persuasive.”
That does not answer my question.
Once again...Did Malihi refute the definition of NBC in Minor and state why he did so?

Your reply only raises another question...Since when has a State case ever held precedent over a SCOTUS case?

255 posted on 02/19/2012 7:58:34 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

WKA as encapsulated in Ankeny is settled law. It does not need to be re-argued - merely applied.

The core of Ankeny is WKA. WKA is the law of the land.


257 posted on 02/19/2012 8:02:06 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson