To: philman_36
He didn’t have to refute anything. He had to apply existing law. Which he did.
You disagree - I got it. The courts will soon tell us which of us is right.
To: Harlan1196
He had to apply existing law. Which he did.Which brings us back to my other questions...
Since when has a State case ever held precedent over a SCOTUS case?
And didn't even Ankeny state that Ark wasn't a NBC?
272 posted on
02/19/2012 8:44:22 AM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Harlan1196
He didn’t have to refute anything.
BTW, I believe you're going to regret making that statement.
273 posted on
02/19/2012 8:47:21 AM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson