I'm not "ordering" you to do anything. I'm requesting that you answer a simple question so that I can continue making my argument...as you requested.
You must first needs answer my question for me to conclude my argument pertaining to this line of questioning.
If you don't want to fulfill my request then simply say so.
I like winning by default.
In what world does me not answering a question make your statements true? It simply means I didn’t answer you.
The courts will decide if you are right or wrong. Such things are not decided by two anonymous non-lawyers on the internet.
Instead of playing 100 questions, why don’t you cut to the chase and simply tell us why the judge will be overturned?
You can lay out a coherent argument without me leading you to your conclusion, can’t you?