[rolling_stone]

I have shown my true conservative character by looking at the messenger to see if he has the experience and character I think reflects that of a true conservative constitutional scholar. Don’t you think character counts for something? You are comfortable by Leo’s character? And you are comfortable with his complete lack of legal experience?

You have demonstrated your character and I find it hard to believe you were a US Navy Commander when you act so juvenile. You still avoid the question what is wrong with his message? Experience is not the end all, just look at the colleges that had professors that never worked in their fields. You aren't even an attorney and you are questioning someone's legal experience? Excuse me while I barf. .

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2809640/posts

[Harlan1196]

I can recognise competence when I see it. Leo is not competent. By what measure do you think Leo is qualified?

What makes him stand out from the thousands of constitutional lawyers in America? All his cases - nope. All his books and articles - nope. His teaching experience at law school - nope again.

Do you really have to be a lawyer to know he is not a law expert? Don’t you have to have experience to gain expertise?