The Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Unit states that they have a 100% conviction rate and btw, Larry Klayman has already admitted in writing that he hasn't been paying his court ordered child support "as a matter of principle".Then you don't have a problem giving a link to that, do you?
So, why would you be so intent on defending a scumbag "deadbeat dad" who is depriving his poor children of a good life?
I'm still waiting for you to prove he's what you claim he is.
Why haven't you answered any of my questions?
When I get all of the necessary information from you I will. You're making the assertion so you need back it up.
The text of his letter you mentioned would be a good start.
Then you don't have a problem giving a link to that, do you?
Already did.
When I get all of the necessary information from you I will. You're making the assertion so you need back it up.
I didn't make the assertion. The Cuyahoga County District Attorney did. What motive would he have to make this up?
The text of his letter you mentioned would be a good start.
Interesting, since I posted that comment
after my original questions. Didn't think that you would bother answering. Makes us wonder what
your agenda is.
"
My ex wife is very vindictive. I divorced her in 2003 and has kept the children from me for 4 years after I had a steady girlfriend, beginning in 2007. There is case law that under these circumstances I do am absolved from child support. The case is Hartman v. Hartman in Fairfax County Family Court in Virginia where we were divorced. The children live in a house I paid for and I have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in real estate and other benefits to her since the divorce. It is a matter of principal for me not to pay child support when I cannot see my children. She is remarried and lives in a house in Cleveland I paid for. The case you mention is a low level crime, not punishable with jail. They want me to pay the support and I will not on principal. I would rather go to trial, because I have a good defense and still cannot see or even talk with my children. I will win this on principal. I do not roll over, as you don’t."
Some morons just don't realize that the child support is for the children and not their ex-spouse. He can afford places in Beverly Hills, Miami and Washington, D.C., but refuses to support his children?
Accordingly, we dismiss this action sua sponte. Relator to pay costs. Seems that the GAL does not want him around those children.