[Mr Rogers]

When the state of Hawaii is described as “a remote, multicultural, migratory island hub way out in the Pacific ocean”, and the blog writer has no knowledge of the law (see http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/325/case.html), then please spare us the blog ping.

[DiogenesLamp]

When the state of Hawaii is described as “a remote, multicultural, migratory island hub way out in the Pacific ocean”, and the blog writer has no knowledge of the law (see http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/325/case.html), then please spare us the blog ping.

He may know more about History than do you. From MY reading, Hawaii was only given State status as a Trade to the Democrats for agreeing to allow Republican Alaska into the Union. Were it on it's own merits, it likely wouldn't have been a state at all, but would have instead been "a remote multicultural, migratory island hub way out in the Pacific ocean" classified as a "territory."

[faucetman]

I found the blog accurate in all the things that I have knowledge of. I did not find that the author ever stated that Obama wasn't a citizen. He just isn't an Article II Natural Born Citizen which is correct. The law you linked is about how difficult it is to lose your citizenship and that no one can lose it for you. The author never said this happened. I fail to see your point.