[visually_augmented]

MM:”There’s a lot to this article, but it basically goes into everything that can be learned by the annotations that are found throughout the document. Take particular notice of the section called “The Left Margin”!”

But if the LFBC is a forgery, then what good is any of the annotations???

[MMaschin]

But if the LFBC is a forgery, then what good is any of the annotations???

As mentioned in the press conference, you can be born anywhere in the world, and still have your birth registered in Hawaii.

So lets assume that someone gets a scanned copy of Obama's LFBC. On the BC it says that Obama was born somewhere other than Hawaii. The person changes the text on the document, but doesn't understand the handwritten a annotations (or have access to a 1961 Vital Statistics Instruction Manual) so they leave them alone.

Box 6a is the 'birth location', and box 7a is 'usual residence of mother'. The annotations to these values, according to the 1961 VSIM indicate that the annotation should be a location code. The location code consisted of a numerical number between 0-56. 0-51 where the States, and DC in alphabetical order. 52-55 where US territories. And 56 was 'The rest of the world'.

Notice left of box 7a, there appears to be a '2', that would be the second digit of '12' which is the code for Hawaii.

Ohhh, but what about box 6a? That appears to not be a '2'. It appears to be a '6'? So - either the BC that was released by the WH is completely fraudulent, or it is based on Obama's actual BC, and his 'birth location' was in Colorado, Iowa, Missouri, Ohio, Vermont, or 'the rest of the world'!