The LFBC released by the White House was a supposed to be a SCAN of the actual BC from the record book in Hawaii. Notice the curve at the left margin. Try again.
The curve in the left margin is problematic for this reason.
The curve resembles the twins Certified Copies. But those certified copies were made in 1965. Well before the days of digital optical (DVD-like) libraries that documents were converted by 1980. When this conversion is done the original is scanned - almost perfectly flat. With no shadows. Unlike the twins that looks like a photograph of the original still in a bound volume.
When the original scanned it can be done in grey scale or in 1-bit. 1-bit will save money since it requires much less space. The LFBCs floating around the web that are 1980 or later look like 1-bit scans with a transparent background. This allows for the image to be put on the security paper and allows the security paper pattern to still come through. The twins curved copies were not done on modern security paper.
So you have a 1960s characteristic on a modern 2000 supposed certified copy. No other post certified copy created since at least 1980 has this curve.
It is a red, red flag.
EXACTLY
How can anyone possibly explain that? The curve isn't even at the left margin, it's in the middle. The background pattern completely surrounds it.
Yes it is supposed to be a scan. But it ain't. What was released by the WH had no such "curve" and was described, by them, as a copy of abstracted "Data on File."
However, I am willing to let Sheriff Joe handle this.