What happened with this document could only happen if someone took an image, scanned it to a computer, and then digitally altered it. It could not have been digitally altered from Hawaii, and then printed, redigitized, printed, and digitized again, because the act of printing and then taking a photocopy of the image (as they claimed they did) would have eliminated any artifact that pointed to intentional editing.
That would mean the alteration would have had to have been done by the WH, and the State of Hawaii is party to the crime by tacitly validating it (failing to blow the whistle).
Pretty neat if the Sheriff can prove that! He'd have to persuade a court with proper jurisdiction to subpoena the Hawaii original and call the Hawaii officials as witnesses. And, of course, the evidence, once dragged into court, would have to prove the case. Maybe if he can get Arizona to deny Zero ballot access, he can bump the case into federal court and persuade a judge to do the above. Don't hold your breath.