[cinciella]

Wow! This is an impressive read! I always wondered what those penciled codes meant...This definitely has new info. that should be considered. Thanks for posting!

Pinging to Nachum

[Red_Devil 232]

An excellent article that exposes this false document by using just the information contained on the document. The reader does not have to be versed in computers or know about pixelation in photoshop. This is the first time I have seen the penciled in codes explained in detail. The explaination of how Obama’s certificate number could have been produced is very detailed and can be hard to follow.

The conclusion by former Social Security Administration record investigators is very damning.

"...Obama’s certificate number is either fraudulently assigned by forgers, or it was changed to an odd number after the original contents of the document were entered in order to prevent inquiries into Obama’s record file tape. Under either circumstance, information about Obama’s birth is being intentionally obscured in order to hide his actual natal history and the negative impact it would have on his eligibility to be president."

[Nachum]

Good one, thanks cinciella!

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[spokeshave]

Wow! This is an impressive read! I always wondered what those penciled codes meant...

Thank you for your researches.....

Can you give us a quick summary about the "pencil codes"

(I thought they were the football launch codes)

Thanks in advance.

[Windflier]

Thanks for posting!

You betcha. This is without doubt, one of (if not the best) articles about Obama's fake bc that I've ever seen.

[Doc Conspiracy]

“I always wondered what those penciled codes meant.”

You will not know what those penciled codes mean by going to the article discussed here because it is a fraud. The supposed images from the 1961 Vital Statistics Instruction manual are actually taken from the 1969 tape layouts (verified by matching imperfections in the image). The actual 1961 code “9” for race (and race is a central part of the argument) is “other non-white” not “not stated” as the article claims. That bit of fraud invalidates a major claim in the article.

Any time an article claims that experts contributed to it, and then no experts are listed, one might reasonably suspect that they are being intentionally misled.

If you really do want to know what the penciled codes mean, read my article:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/decoding-the-long-form-part-2/