And yet his eligibility is based on his say-so, and his rigid control of the proof which he won't let anyone see.
Seems to me the eligibility issue is highly dependent on the Honesty issue, and we know he's a self serving liar.
You don't see the irony in this?
No. It is also based on the say so of officials from the state of Hawaii.
It is also based on the absolute failure of the birthers to make a compelling argument that would stand up in a court of law.
Face it - if birthers had their act together, it is completely irrelevant what Obama says and does. An official investigation by law enforcement can compel all the evidence they need. Yet birthers can’t seem to convince anyone of significance that they have anything that might justify such an investigation.
My suggestion would be to look at the public face of birtherism: A professional poker player with no legal experience; a dentist with a law degree from an online law school recognized in only one state; a “journalist” with a proven history of peddling any conspiracy theory he thinks will make him money; and the publisher of a tabloid web site that makes the National Enquirer look rational.
You want to be taken seriously? Then get some serious spokespeople.