The state has a duty to diminish or eliminate the inefficient, and prevent their breeding

PGA Weblog ^

[Rashputin]

The democrat party is now and always has been the party of slavery, sedition, treason, secession, civil war, KKK terrorism, Jim Crow laws, eugenics laws, constant voter fraud, constant voter intimidation, antisemitic immigration restrictions (in response to Nazi Nuremberg laws), advocates of titles of nobility for protected classes of citizens who are above the law, creators of anti-Christian mythology, creators of the welfare plantation system, advocates for infanticide, euthanasia, homosexuality, bestiality, and sexual perversions of every sort, as well as being the party that designed, implemented, and fights to lavishly fund the systematic, racist, eugenics driven, mass murder of minority infants.

The democrat party has to be so thoroughly destroyed as a national political party that it is no longer a factor in national politics.

The entire democrat machine, including both government employee unions and the democrat rewards, recruitment, and propaganda infrastructure laughably called "academia", needs to be fought until, to paraphrase Bull Halsey, “ ... democrat is only spoken in hell”.

Regards

[redgolum]

Somewhat yes. But that doesn’t mean that selecting for only high IQ is a good idea.

We still need people to do tasks like drive a bus. Also, high IQ persons are more likely to be insane.

[Repeat Offender]

Also, high IQ persons are more likely to be insane.

ThE vOiCeS aLl AgReE, jUsT bEcAuSe YoU'rE nOt SmArT eNoUgH tO sEe "EvErYoNe In ThE rOoM mUsT dIe" Is ThE cOrReCt AnSwEr DoEsN't, MeAn ItS tHe WrOnG aNsWeR. AnD i KnOw YoU wErE wAtChInG mE tYpE tHiS fRoM kArPaThIyAn 5. /s

[tiki]

Yes, but in my family the two that are geniuses per IQ tests are the most stupid ones and they’re both extremely liberal. I, on the other hand don’t quite reach the level of genius but I have SOME common sense.

[coloradan]

The ones who can do a lot with a little, don’t need welfare and I don’t object in the least to having them pay for their own extra babies.

[coloradan]

I didn’t say we should select for only high IQ. More like, let’s not pay those lacking initiative (other than having extra babies) to have extra babies.

[nvscanman]

These theories would almost certainly mean that a lot of
people would be “eliminated” that had great value to society. Prof. Stephen Hawking of course would not be
allowed to “waste” society’s resources. Lots of others
would have to be eliminated also before they had time
to contribute. Not all who are physically imperfect are
useless.

[grey_whiskers]

Shameless self-promotion, but it mentions your point in passing, and puts it into context wrt recent events:

(Vanity) This is no Fluke, It's More Like a Hydra

Cheers!

[Absolutely Nobama]

BTTT!!

[little jeremiah]

Even non-rocket scientists can figure out how to make babies/not make babies, and then work to support them if they show up.