Replies

I think it’s very similar to Georgia: the case could be appealed to the state Supreme Court, but they’re not going to rule against Obama. And they all know this is about Obama.

It’s more blatant - because there’s no interpretation necessary to know that no burden of proof is met when no evidence is presented, and that a document not forbidden for release has to be disclosed as allowed by law - but the judiciary has been wiping its bottom on the rule of law on the eligibility issue from Day One. And as long as the judiciary is willing to ignore the law, there’s nothing we can do about it within the legal system. At least not in time for this issue.

That’s why this has always been about the rule of law and not about Obama at all. If judges are able to ignore laws, procedures, precedents, etc, then ANYTHING could be ruled. If bureaucrats are able to make up whatever rules they want, ignore any rules they want, alter records at will, lie at will (as Holder wants government to be able to do in response to records requests), destroy records that are required to be stored permanently, refuse to look the right place for documents they have, and refuse to answer questions, requests, subpoenas, etc, then there is no assurance that ANY records or processes are genuine.