Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kartographer
I found the show to be interesting, but most people seem to be single-scenario preppers. The looniest one was the New England lady who wanted nothing to do with firearms. Does she really think no one will take her food at gunpoint when the SHTF?!

If the SHTF, city dwellers are pretty much screwed. Those with the best chance are those who are the farthest away from civilization who have planned for sustainable sources of food and water.

Personally, I believe in preparing for multiple contingencies. A powerful earthquake would just have me hunkering down in my house. A financial collapse that leads to widespread unrest would have me going remote to an area that would provide me with isolation, water, lots of game, fowl, and fish. Very doable in Alaska if you have an airplane.

29 posted on 03/10/2012 3:57:50 PM PST by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AlaskaErik

“If the SHTF, city dwellers are pretty much screwed.”

I think thats a myth. Sure if you live in a high rise your chances will be slim. Otherwise the remote farmstead is highly vulnerable. Whether its the govt forcing you to relocate or looters seeking to steal what you have.

In a mad max scenerio it will take a small community working together to survive. In anything less there are advantages to living in areas more likely to receive aid or emergency resources.


33 posted on 03/10/2012 4:06:51 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson