Newt supporters have trashed Rick for so long. I have never said anything negative about Newt because I said I would vote for him if Rick did not make it. Well, since the Rick trashing won’t stop, what goes around comes around.
Newt;“I think if you have mandatory carbon caps combined with a trading system, much like we did with sulfur, and if you have a tax-incentive program for investing in the solutions, that there’s a package there that’s very, very good. And frankly, it’s something I would strongly support.”
The cozy relationship Gingrich has with the ethanol industry led to his consulting business winning more than $300,000 in fees from the ethanol lobby after he left Congress. The Wall Street Journal noted April 27, 2011 that “Professor Gingrich says his ethanol support is grounded in his lifetime of studying history and intellectual problems, but what about that $312,500 from the ethanol lobby?... We’ve never suggested Mr. Gingrich has been bought off, though of course there wouldn’t be an ethanol lobby to hire Mr. Gingrich if there weren’t politicians like Mr. Gingrich willing to prop it up with taxpayer dollars, tariffs and mandates.”
The Santorum supporters have been consistent in attacking Newt on ethanol..now, a article on RS and ethanol comes out showing in his own words that he supports a mandate and that is bashing? I call it vetting. Cain, Perry, Newt (incessantly) have been going through it...it seems as if Mitt and RS have been the exception.
It is important to know the facts not something made up...the truth about the candidates.