No it was not what happened in the Simpson trial. In that case the chance of innocence was conclusively, without challenge, 3/infinity and those theoretical three were not associated with the victims. Practically speaking that means both asides agreed, one by proof and the other tacitly, that the chance of innocence was zero. The jury knew that too. The statement they made was that the white bi-ch deserved it. If that’s jury nullification, OK....so be it. I didn’t think Nicole deserved it, but that’s just me. Oh, I am an attorney in practice and academia; specialty field-science in the courtroom.
That is what I think happened, and to me it is jury nullification.
The jury couldn't say yes, we believe he did it, but we think it was justified, and we don't want him punished.
The sentence is up to the judge, and not the jury so the easiest way out is "Not Guilty."- Tom