Full title: Fluke on Maher's Attack on Palin: 'I'm Not Going to Speak About Particular Labels That Have Been Applied to Particular Women'
1 posted on
03/21/2012 3:59:42 PM PDT by
Nachum
To: Nachum
But no matter who is demeaning women, it’s always unacceptable.”
I agree. Especially when it’s sluts that are demeaning themselves.
2 posted on
03/21/2012 4:04:24 PM PDT by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: Nachum
What Fluke said: “I’m not going to speak about particular labels that have been applied to particular women."
What Fluke meant: “I’m not going to speak about particular labels that have been applied to conservative women."
4 posted on
03/21/2012 4:10:01 PM PDT by
Leaning Right
(Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: Nachum
Fluke responded: “I’m not going to speak That good, 'cause I'm not gonna listen.
Beat it, Butch. Your 15 minutes are up.
5 posted on
03/21/2012 4:11:21 PM PDT by
skeeter
To: Nachum
She probably could be President.
The lib press would cover for her.
She just has to wait until there is a fresh bunch of clueless 18-34 y/o to enthusastically vote for her because she is a women..and that would be historic!
6 posted on
03/21/2012 4:16:42 PM PDT by
Leep
(Dueling tag lines=don't worry,you'll be a vegetable guy soon<>It's gonna be a Newt day!)
To: Nachum
But no matter who is demeaning women, it’s always unacceptable.”
Unless its accompanied by at least one million dollars to ease the discomfort.
7 posted on
03/21/2012 4:21:29 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Nachum
Another example of what total frauds liberals are. They really have no morals at all other than advancing statism.
9 posted on
03/24/2012 12:22:51 PM PDT by
fkabuckeyesrule
(Lets institute SARAH-ia law in America!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson