[Flintlock]

Wouldn’t you have to be a legally-elected POTUS in order to be “impeached”??

Whaydya call it when the POTUS was never qualified for the office in the first place?

[TomGuy]

Dems control the Senate, so even if the House did impeach him, it would be perceived as an election-year ploy.

It would do more damage to the weakly GOP than to Obama.

[Recall who lost their jobs as a result of the last impeachment attempt — Gingrich(R) and and his successor Livingston(R).]

[Young Werther]

I agree with Panetta and Obama. It is important that we confer with the Powers on High!

[chatham]

Impeach Him Now.. Don’t wait.

[Cheburashka]

You need 67 votes in the Senate to remove Obama from office. The Republicans have 47 seats. Please list the 20 Demonrat Senators who will to vote to convict. If you can't do it, you're wasting our time.

[jaydee770]

The question is not so much “What” Obama could be impeached for — the impossible question is “Who” do you realistically believe would actually act to impeach him *regardless* of the grounds?

Even if Obama was caught on security cameras and by the FBI in the act of personally breaking into a Watergate office to get some Lewinski-lovin’ while holding hard-copies of launch codes addressed to a known Iranian spy, the gutless, feckless bumbling, doofus-duo of Boehner/McConnell wouldn’t do a thing about it.

Unfortunately for the country, we are stuck with the kenyan until he is voted out.