No, the point of the illustration was the thesis of the article: Darwinism posits throw-away people, inferior people, etc.
The point was about the author’s theory of why she went on a rant: throw away people.
How you get that it was about her wanting to kill people is also how propaganda gets birthed. Quit the spin, TL. It’s obvious.
And then goes on to argue that there's nothing crazy about what she did - ie it was all perfectly rational.