Skip to comments.Santorum's (PROFANE) Fat Bottom Girl
Posted on 03/24/2012 12:01:46 AM PDT by rightjb
PolitiJim followers are aware of the recent demand for a retraction from Dallas based Alice Linahan and her new media consulting Voicesempower. Its bad enough she is now trying to make money off of the Tea Party movement. Alice also claims to be a newspaper owner, and yet seems unfamiliar with LIBEL LAWS or a little known journalistic practice called honesty in sourcing.
But a Catholic, 100% prolife Santorum supporter started attacking PolitiJim on Thursday pickingup the Linahan attack. What the HELL!???
"Tiffany" or (@MrsKlein54) complained about PolitiJim's acronym Santorum Lovers Unwilling To Soberly Syllogize. SHE WAS OFFENDED.
But what followed was the strangest rabbit trail we've seen so far this year. And it lead to the Santorum campaign and possibly Media Matters For America....
(Excerpt) Read more at politijim.com ...
And this is news because???? Obscure source and who the hell cares?
Wow. Nothing better to do than personally attack an obscure Santorum supporter? Seriously? I guess since Santorum is the only threat to liberal Romney he needs to be taken down, so the establishment can feel secure.
PolitiJim sounds and looks like nothing more than an attack dog for the Romney campaign, maybe even a closeted Obama site. Whoever runs it might have one or more screws loose.
Looks like he has exposed an occupier pretender helping santorum’s campaign (calling the pretender out) who was brought in from the dems to cause probs with tea party. a lot of us know the occupiers libs are voting for him. ( my opinion is rick is Not a tea party player only when he is looking for votes) Jim was smart to piece it together and that she isn’t a tea party-er who has been taking his ideas/facts of the candidates to task.
What about Obamas fat bottomed girl..
Is this what you guys call a blog-pimp?
What about Obamas fat bottomed girl....She rocks around the whole wide world.
Go and check out his site before you make accusations. His articles are well researched. You might learn something.
We don’t have a Tea Party candidate. I don’t think a guy that was one of the few repubs to vote to create the Dept. of Education, when Reagan was against it, is someone I would call Tea Party either. uh....guess who that is?
I know someone who would call it that...
Sure smells like it to me. Lemme check with the Blogger Overlord....
Sure looks like blog pimping to me.
If it is the poster’s own blog, he has no need to excerpt it.
He’s done that twice so far, time will tell.
I am new to this term. I first saw it here a few weeks ago.
I sure would. An incomprehensible excerpt from an unknown blog with no explanation in the comment line. Fits the profile.
It's really a shame people do that so much here.
Symptom 1 is the blogger excerpts his own or an associate’s blog and tries to drive hits to the blog page. Excerpting is only necessary when a formal source demands it legally. Otherwise it is just pimping to get hits.
Symptom 2 is the poster does not join the conversation in the thread. They are too busy pimping their blog on other forums.
Posting a blog pimp thread as “News” is especially egregious. Such things belong in the “Bloggers” section.