Posted on 03/25/2012 9:58:58 AM PDT by Starman417
I have the feeling this is going to come back and bite Obama, just like the Sandra Fluke thing.
Under federal law, a riot is a public disturbance involving an act of violence by one or more persons assembled in a group of at least three people. Inciting a riot applies to a person who organizes, encourages, or participates in a riot. It can apply to one who urges or instigates others to riot. According to 18 USCS § 2102 "to incite a riot", or "to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot", includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot, but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of, or the right to commit, any such act or acts. "
This goes for Spike Lee too.
Obama wants a race war this summer, so we won’t have November elections. I pray that non-blacks will ignore the whole black mess. Let them rant and rave about their imagined oppression in this country.
Is there an organization that offers one-way passage back to Africa for dissatisfied blacks?
The Leftists in the media do the electronic lynching followed up with the physical lynching by the Nation of Islam and the New Black Panthers.
In the last two years over 2000 blacks were murdered by
other blacks all over the country.
If that many died as a result of measles, whooping cough, small pox the CDC would declare a national emergency.
Black outrage is selective indeed.
I have had a bellyful of racist “blacks” who seek to promote their generational victimhood anyway they can. If they don’t like America, they have my permission to LEAVE and settle their own country, make their own way and build their own culture instead of leeching from ours.
At this point I am going to say that If I knew how to contact George, I would offer to stand guard over him as he slept free of charge.
Do you have a source for that stat? Not questioning it, but I want to use it but want a backup source for it.
There was a picture of Trayvon of how he looked at age 17. It was on tinypic.com but has since been scrubbed. Makes you really wonder what is going on
Well....they DID, in fact, settle their own country. I believe it’s called Liberia. And see how well THAT turned out....lol.
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/liberia/index.html
As much as anything, the Al Sharptons and Obama want to provoke open expressions of white supremacy and division. They are being successful all around.
“There have been 34 homicides in Chicago this month alone. It wouldn’t surprise me if half or more of them were black teens.’
The numbers are even higher....I juxtaposed figures around the country....34 homicides in Chicago alone multiplied by
the same or near number in Atlanta...In the near future I’ll do the web search to more accurately post the numbers.
Either way one looks at it....there is an epidemic of black murders by other blacks....
My question is this; If Zimmerman or his bodyguard shot a member of the New Black Panther Party wouldn’t it automatically be self defense? They threatened him in a very public way, they are known to arm themselves and have a reputation for violence.
“there is an epidemic of black murders by other blacks”
^^^^^^^^
This
No. In order to justify the use of deadly force, one must reasonably be in fear of (apprehend) imminent serious injury or death. An alternative to having an actual apprehension of imminent serious personal injury or death is to repel a home invader. If you are female, "serious injury" includes unwanted contact of a sexual nature.
Zimmerman capping a New Blank Panther just because they are a$$holes is no more justified than Martin closing distance with Zimmerman in order to hit him.
“”An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”
This is despicable, but it’s no surprise that Obama panders to his base by leaping to a judgment rather than being a responsible leader and denounced both premature leaps to judgment as well as vigilantism. The available (admittedly murky and incomplete) facts don’t support the claim that Zimmerman shot and killed an innocent boy in cold blood. His victim appears to have initiated the physical attack, which greatly calls into question presumptions of his “innocence.” As in the Duke lacrosse case, justice is better served by letting an investigation take its course rather than preemptively stringing up Zimmerman for an alleged miscarriage of justice.
You can't have a revolution without a war!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.